Reference Detail

Contact

Missing content? – Request curation!

Request curation for specific Genes, Variants, or PubMed publications.

Have questions, comments, or suggestions? - Let us know!

Email us at : ckbsupport@jax.org

Ref Type Journal Article
PMID (29723688)
Authors Dudnik E, Peled N, Nechushtan H, Wollner M, Onn A, Agbarya A, Moskovitz M, Keren S, Popovits-Hadari N, Urban D, Mishaeli M, Zer A, Allen AM, Rabinovich NM, Rotem O, Kuznetsov T, Shochat T, Roisman LC, Bar J, Israel Lung Cancer Group
Title BRAF Mutant Lung Cancer: Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression, Tumor Mutational Burden, Microsatellite Instability Status, and Response to Immune Check-Point Inhibitors.
URL
Abstract Text The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) in BRAF mutant NSCLC is unknown.Multi-institutional retrospective chart review identified 39 patients with BRAF mutant NSCLC. The patients were divided into two groups: V600E (group A, n = 21) and non-V600E (group B, n = 18). Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability status were assessed in 29 (74%), 11 (28%), and 12 (31%) patients, respectively. Objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) with ICPi, and overall survival were analyzed.High (≥50%), intermediate (1-49%), and no (<1%) PD-L1 expression was observed in 8 of 19 (42%), 6 of 19 (32%), 5 of 19 (26%), and 5 of 10 (50%), 1 of 10 (10%), and 4 of 10 (40%) cases in groups A and B, respectively. Two tumors in group A showed high TMB (25%); none were microsatellite instability status-high. Twenty-two patients (group A, n = 12; group B, n = 10) received ICPi. Objective response rate with ICPi was 25% and 33% in groups A and B, respectively (p = 1.0). Median PFS with ICPi was 3.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-6.6), and 4.1 months (95% CI: 0.1-19.6) in groups A and B, respectively (log-rank test = 0.81, p = 0.37). Neither BRAF mutation type nor PD-L1 expression affected the response probability/PFS. Median overall survival was not reached (95% CI: 13-NR) and comprised 21.1 months (95% CI: 1.8-NR) for patients who were and were not exposed to ICPi, respectively (log-rank test = 5.58, p = 0.018).BRAF mutant NSCLC is associated with high level of PD-L1 expression, low/intermediate TMB and microsatellite-stable status. ICPi have favorable activity both in BRAF V600E and BRAF non-V600E mutant NSCLC.

Filtering

  • Case insensitive filtering will display rows if any text in any cell matches the filter term
  • Use simple literal full or partial string matches
  • Separate multiple filter terms with a space. Any order may be used (i. e. a b c and c b a are equivalent )
  • Filtering will only apply to rows that are already loaded on the page. Filtering has no impact on query parameters.
  • Use quotes to match on a longer phrase with spaces (i.e. "mtor c1483f")

Sorting

  • Generally, the default sort order for tables is set to be first column ascending; however, specific tables may set a different default sort order.
  • Click on any column header arrows to sort by that column
  • Hold down the Shift key and click multiple columns to sort by more than one column. Be sure to set ascending or descending order for a given column before moving on to the next column.

Molecular Profile Treatment Approach
Gene Name Source Synonyms Protein Domains Gene Description Gene Role
Therapy Name Drugs Efficacy Evidence Clinical Trials
Drug Name Trade Name Synonyms Drug Classes Drug Description
Gene Variant Impact Protein Effect Variant Description Associated with drug Resistance
Molecular Profile Indication/Tumor Type Response Type Therapy Name Approval Status Evidence Type Efficacy Evidence References
BRAF V600E lung non-small cell carcinoma not predictive Atezolizumab Clinical Study - Cohort Actionable In a retrospective analysis, non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring BRAF V600E did not demonstrate a significantly different response to treatment with either Keytruda (pembrolizumab), Opdivo (nivolumab), or Tecentriq (atezolizumab) compared to patients with BRAF non-V600E mutations, demonstrating an objective response rate of 25% (3/12) vs 33% (3/9) (p=1.0) and median progression-free survival of 3.7 months vs 4.1 months (p=0.37) (PMID: 29723688). 29723688
BRAF V600E lung non-small cell carcinoma not predictive Nivolumab Clinical Study - Cohort Actionable In a retrospective analysis, non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring BRAF V600E did not demonstrate a significantly different response to treatment with either Keytruda (pembrolizumab), Opdivo (nivolumab), or Tecentriq (atezolizumab), compared to patients with BRAF non-V600E mutations, demonstrating an objective response rate of 25% (3/12) vs 33% (3/9) (p=1.0) and median progression-free survival of 3.7 months vs 4.1 months (p=0.37) (PMID: 29723688). 29723688
BRAF V600E lung non-small cell carcinoma not predictive Pembrolizumab Clinical Study - Cohort Actionable In a retrospective analysis, non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring BRAF V600E did not demonstrate a significantly different response to treatment with either Keytruda (pembrolizumab), Opdivo (nivolumab), or Tecentriq (atezolizumab), compared to patients with BRAF non-V600E mutations, demonstrating an objective response rate of 25% (3/12) vs 33% (3/9) (p=1.0) and median progression-free survival of 3.7 months vs 4.1 months (p=0.37) (PMID: 29723688). 29723688