Reference Detail

Contact

Missing content? – Request curation!

Request curation for specific Genes, Variants, or PubMed publications.

Have questions, comments, or suggestions? - Let us know!

Email us at : ckbsupport@jax.org

Ref Type
PMID
Authors Gerald Steven Falchook , Razelle Kurzrock , Hesham M. Amin , Siqing Fu , Sarina Anne Piha-Paul , Filip JankuHongxia Zheng , Barbara Sarholz , Andreas Johne , David S. Hong
Title Efficacy, safety, biomarkers, and phase II dose modeling in a phase I trial of the oral selective c-Met inhibitor tepotinib (MSC2156119J).
URL https://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.2591
Abstract Text Background: Tumor c-Met overexpression is associated with tumor aggression and poor prognosis, making it a target for therapy. This phase I study (NCT01014936) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors provided data that allowed determination of a recommended phase II dose (RP2D) for the selective oral c-Met inhibitor tepotinib (MSC2156119J). Methods: Primary objectives were to determine the MTD and RP2D. Secondary endpoints included antitumor activity, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics. Pts received tepotinib according to one of three 3-weekly regimens (R): 30–230 mg/d d1–14 followed by 7-d rest (R1); 30–115 mg/d 3x/week (R2); or 300–1400mg/d d1–21 (R3). Interim PK and biomarker data were analyzed using a population modeling approach. Using these data and the exposure/target inhibition relationship established in mice, a human population PK model was developed to simulate c-Met inhibition profiles in humans and determine the biologically active dose of tepotinib. Results: As of 9/30/2014,143 pts had been enrolled (R1 = 42; R2 = 45; R3 = 56). The MTD was not reached at ≤ 1400 mg/day d1–21 (R3). Among the 56 pts treated with R3 (c-Met overexpressing 12; amplified 4; overexpressing and amplified 3), treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) were observed in 61%. Of these, > 75% experienced trAEs of worst grade 1/2. Seven pts (13%) experienced trAEs of worst grade ≥ 3: fatigue (2), peripheral edema (2), ALT increase (1), AST increase (1), hyponatremia (1), edema (1), and thrombocytopenia (1). Of the 56pts treated with R3, 2 had a PR and 7 had SD as their best overall response. Patients with PRs had tumors with c-Met overexpression or amplification, as did 2/7 pts with SD. A biologically active dose of 500 mg/d was selected as the RP2D based on a translational modeling approach, with simulations indicating that ≥ 95% pMET inhibition was required for tumor regression. Human population PK simulations suggested that tepotinib 500 mg daily could achieve continuous pMET inhibition of ≥ 95% in 90% of the population. Conclusions: Tepotinib is well tolerated and shows antitumor activity, particularly in pts with c-Met overexpressing/amplified tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT01014936.

Filtering

  • Case insensitive filtering will display rows if any text in any cell matches the filter term
  • Use simple literal full or partial string matches
  • Separate multiple filter terms with a space. Any order may be used (i. e. a b c and c b a are equivalent )
  • Filtering will only apply to rows that are already loaded on the page. Filtering has no impact on query parameters.
  • Use quotes to match on a longer phrase with spaces (i.e. "mtor c1483f")

Sorting

  • Generally, the default sort order for tables is set to be first column ascending; however, specific tables may set a different default sort order.
  • Click on any column header arrows to sort by that column
  • Hold down the Shift key and click multiple columns to sort by more than one column. Be sure to set ascending or descending order for a given column before moving on to the next column.

Molecular Profile Treatment Approach
Gene Name Source Synonyms Protein Domains Gene Description Gene Role
Therapy Name Drugs Efficacy Evidence Clinical Trials
Drug Name Trade Name Synonyms Drug Classes Drug Description
Gene Variant Impact Protein Effect Variant Description Associated with drug Resistance
Molecular Profile Indication/Tumor Type Response Type Therapy Name Approval Status Evidence Type Efficacy Evidence References