Missing content? – Request curation!
Request curation for specific Genes, variants, or PubMed publications.
Have questions, comments or suggestions? - Let us know!
Email us at : firstname.lastname@example.org
|Authors||Carmen Calfa, Michael Rothe, Pam K. Mangat, Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, Eugene Ahn, Keerthi Gogineni, Nitin Rohatgi, Monika L. Burness, Anu Gaba, Omid Hamid, Tareq Albaghdadi, Alison Conlin, Philip Gold, Jordi Rodon, Ramya Thota and Richard L. Schilsky|
|Title||Sunitinib (S) in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with FGFR1 mutations or amplifications: Results from the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) Study|
|Abstract Text||Background: TAPUR is a phase II basket study evaluating anti-tumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in pts with advanced cancers with genomic alterations. S is an oral multi-kinase inhibitor that inhibits Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor family members 1-4 (FGFR1-4) in biochemical and cellular assays and is FDA approved in several tumor types. Results in a cohort of mBC pts with FGFR1 mutations (mut) or amplifications (amp) treated with S are reported. Methods: Eligible pts had mBC, no standard treatment (tx) options, measurable disease, ECOG Performance Status (PS) 0-2, and adequate organ function. Genomic testing was performed in CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited site selected labs. Pts received S 50 mg orally daily for four weeks followed by two weeks off, until tumor progression. Simon 2-stage design tested the null disease control (DC) - defined as partial (PR), complete response (CR) or stable disease at 16+ weeks (SD 16+) - rate of 15% vs. 35% (power = 0.85; α = 0.10). If ≥2 of 10 pts in stage 1 have DC, 18 more pts are enrolled. If ≥7 of 28 pts have DC, the null DC rate is rejected. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: Thirty pts with mBC with FGFR1 mut (1 pt), amp (28 pts), or both (1 pt) were enrolled from Oct 2016 to June 2019. 3 were not evaluable and excluded from efficacy analyses. Demographics and outcomes are summarized in Table 1. Two partial responses (PR) and 5 SD16+ (FGFR1 amp only) were observed for DC and OR rates of 29% (95% CI: 13%, 42%) and 7% (95% CI: 1%, 24%), respectively, and the null DC rate of 15% was rejected (p=0.09). S related grade 3-5 TAEs (Table 1) were consistent with the product label for S except encephalopathy. Conclusions: Monotherapy S showed modest anti-tumor activity and clinically significant TAEs in heavily pre-treated pts with mBC with FGFR1 amplification.|
|Molecular Profile||Treatment Approach|
|Gene Name||Source||Synonyms||Protein Domains||Gene Description||Gene Role|
|Therapy Name||Drugs||Efficacy Evidence||Clinical Trials|
|Drug Name||Trade Name||Synonyms||Drug Classes||Drug Description|
|Gene||Variant||Impact||Protein Effect||Variant Description||Associated with drug Resistance|
|Molecular Profile||Indication/Tumor Type||Response Type||Therapy Name||Approval Status||Evidence Type||Efficacy Evidence||References|
|FGFR1 amp||breast cancer||predicted - sensitive||Sunitinib||Phase II||Actionable||In a Phase II trial, Sutent (sunitinib) treatment demonstrated antitumor activity in metastatic breast cancer patients with FGFR1 amplification (n = 28), FGFR1 mutation (n = 1), or both (n = 1), and led to an objective response rate of 7% (2/30, including 2 partial responses), stable disease greater than 16 weeks in 5 patients, and a disease control rate of 29% (Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT173).||detail...|