Reference Detail

Contact

Missing content? – Request curation!

Request curation for specific Genes, Variants, or PubMed publications.

Have questions, comments, or suggestions? - Let us know!

Email us at : ckbsupport@jax.org

Ref Type
PMID
Authors J. Lickliter, L. Mileshkin, M. Voskoboynik, M. Millward, A. Freimund, T. Meniawy, T. Tang, R. Wei, M. Li, V. Paton
Title Dose escalation/expansion study to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, food effect, and antitumor activity of BGB-290 in patients with advanced solid tumors
URL https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)37789-9/fulltext
Abstract Text Background: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) represent a class of antitumor agents that exert their cytotoxic effects by inhibiting PARP activity. Some PARPis are capable of trapping PARP proteins on DNA further augmenting cell death. BGB-290 is a potent and selective PARP1/2 inhibitor with strong PARP-trapping and antitumor activity in both in vitro and in vivo preclinical tumor models harboring BRCA gene mutations or other homologous recombination defects. Methods: This two-staged study (NCT02361723) consists of a Phase 1A dose-escalation/dose-finding component to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of BGB-290 in patients with solid tumors and a two-part Phase 2 component that includes expansion in targeted indications (Part A) and the effect of food on the BGB-290 pharmacokinetic (PK) profile (Part B). Results: As of 1 May 2017, Phase 1A had completed enrollment (n = 45); 3 patients remain on treatment. Objective responses were observed across the dose range (2.5–120 mg BID). Of the 23 evaluable patients with gynecological cancer, 10 (43%) achieved an objective response per RECIST 1.1 (n = 3 complete; n = 7 partial). More patients with germline BRCA 1/2 mutated ovarian cancer achieved an objective response (n = 7/12, 58%) than patients not carrying the mutation (n = 2/8, 25%). Drug-related adverse events (AEs) reported in ≥ 10% of patients were nausea, fatigue, anemia, vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia and neutropenia. Anemia and neutropenia were the most common drug-related Grade 3 AEs; no Grade 4 drug-related AEs were reported. Three BGB-290-related serious AEs were reported (anemia, n = 2; nausea, n = 1). Four deaths were associated with an AE; however, none were considered drug-related. The BGB-290 RP2D was determined as 60 mg BID and is being evaluated in Phase 2 to determine antitumor activity and food effects. Dose escalation to determine MTD with QD dosing is ongoing. Conclusions: BGB-290 has demonstrated a favorable safety profile and promising preliminary antitumor activity in phase 1A; phase 2 is ongoing evaluating in patients with ovarian, breast, prostate, gastric and small cell lung cancer.

Filtering

  • Case insensitive filtering will display rows if any text in any cell matches the filter term
  • Use simple literal full or partial string matches
  • Separate multiple filter terms with a space. Any order may be used (i. e. a b c and c b a are equivalent )
  • Filtering will only apply to rows that are already loaded on the page. Filtering has no impact on query parameters.
  • Use quotes to match on a longer phrase with spaces (i.e. "mtor c1483f")

Sorting

  • Generally, the default sort order for tables is set to be first column ascending; however, specific tables may set a different default sort order.
  • Click on any column header arrows to sort by that column
  • Hold down the Shift key and click multiple columns to sort by more than one column. Be sure to set ascending or descending order for a given column before moving on to the next column.

Molecular Profile Treatment Approach
Gene Name Source Synonyms Protein Domains Gene Description Gene Role
Therapy Name Drugs Efficacy Evidence Clinical Trials
Drug Name Trade Name Synonyms Drug Classes Drug Description
Gene Variant Impact Protein Effect Variant Description Associated with drug Resistance
Molecular Profile Indication/Tumor Type Response Type Therapy Name Approval Status Evidence Type Efficacy Evidence References