Missing content? – Request curation!
Request curation for specific Genes, variants, or PubMed publications.
Have questions, comments or suggestions? - Let us know!
Email us at : firstname.lastname@example.org
|Authors||Kathryn F. Mileham; Michael Rothe; Pam K. Mangat; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Eddy S. Yang; Olatunji B. Alese; Angela Jain; Herbert L. Duvivier; Phillip Palmbos; Eugene R. Ahn; Jeanny B. Aragon-Ching; Kathleen W. Beekman; Deepti Behl; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Rodolfo Gutierrez; Amy Sanford; Ramya Thota; Michael Zakem; Song Zhao; Raegan O'Lone; Gina N. Grantham; Susan Halabi; Richard L. Schilsky|
|Title||Olaparib (O) in patients (pts) with solid tumors with ATM mutation or deletion: Results from the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) Study|
|Abstract Text||Background: TAPUR is a phase II basket study evaluating anti-tumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in pts with advanced cancers with specific genomic alterations. Results in a cohort of pts with solid tumors with ATM mutation (mut) or deletion (del) treated with O are reported. Methods: Eligible pts had solid tumors, no standard treatment (tx) options, measurable disease, ECOG Performance Status (PS) 0-2, and adequate organ function. Genomic testing was performed in CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited site selected labs. Pts received O tablets (300mg) or capsules (400mg) orally twice daily until disease progression. Low accruing histology-specific cohorts with the same genomic alteration were collapsed into one histology-pooled cohort for this analysis. Primary endpoint was disease control (DC) (complete (CR) or partial (PR) response or stable disease at 16+ wks (SD16+)) (RECIST v1.1). For histology-specific cohorts a Simon 2-stage design with a null DC rate of 15% vs. 35% (power = 0.85; α = 0.10) requires 28 pts with futility stopping after 10 pts. For histology-pooled cohorts with sample size > 28, if the lower limit of a one-sided 90% CI is >15%, the null hypothesis of a DC rate of 15% is rejected. 2-sided 95% CIs were used for other efficacy endpoint estimates. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: 39 pts with solid tumors (17 histologies) with ATM mut (n=36) or del (n=3) were enrolled from 6/2016 to 1/2019. 3 pts were unevaluable for efficacy. Table 1 shows demographics and outcomes. 1 CR (prostate), 2 PR (unknown primary) and 6 SD16+ were observed in pts with ATM mut for a DC rate of 25% (90% CI: 16%, 100%) and an OR rate of 8% (95% CI: 2%, 23%). The null DC rate was rejected. 9 pts had ≥1 Grade 3 tx-related adverse or serious adverse event related to O. Conclusions: Monotherapy O showed evidence of anti-tumor activity in pts with various solid tumors with ATM mut.|
|Molecular Profile||Treatment Approach|
|Gene Name||Source||Synonyms||Protein Domains||Gene Description||Gene Role|
|Therapy Name||Drugs||Efficacy Evidence||Clinical Trials|
|Drug Name||Trade Name||Synonyms||Drug Classes||Drug Description|
|Gene||Variant||Impact||Protein Effect||Variant Description||Associated with drug Resistance|
|Molecular Profile||Indication/Tumor Type||Response Type||Therapy Name||Approval Status||Evidence Type||Efficacy Evidence||References|
|ATM mutant||Advanced Solid Tumor||predicted - sensitive||Olaparib||Phase II||Actionable||In a Phase II trial (TAPUR), Lynparza (olaparib) treatment resulted in an objective response rate of 8% and a disease control rate of 25% (9/36, 1 complete response, 2 partial responses, 6 stable disease at 16+ weeks) in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring ATM mutations (Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT110; NCT02693535).||detail...|