Missing content? – Request curation!
Request curation for specific Genes, variants, or PubMed publications.
Have questions, comments or suggestions? - Let us know!
Email us at : email@example.com
|Ref Type||Journal Article|
|Authors||Dahlrot RH, Kristensen BW, Hjelmborg J, Herrstedt J, Hansen S|
|Title||A population-based study of low-grade gliomas and mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1).|
|Journal||Journal of neuro-oncology|
|Abstract Text||Low-grade gliomas (LGG) have a slow growth rate, but transformations into malignant gliomas with a rapid deterioration occur in many patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical prognostic factors in a population-based cohort of patients with LGG. In addition we investigated the expression and prognostic value of the isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) R132H mutation. Seventy-four patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2009 in the Region of Southern Denmark were identified using the Danish Cancer Register and The Danish Pathology Databank. Survival analysis using Cox regression was performed in 52 patients with tumor samples useable for immunohistochemical evaluation of IDH1 status. Patients with a contrast enhancing tumor, neurological deficits, headache, an astrocytic tumor and PS 2-4 had an increased risk of recurrence. In univariate analysis age > 50 years (HR 2.14, 95 % CI 1.08-4.24), having neurological deficit (HR 2.28, 95 % CI 1.15-4.52), receiving post-surgical treatment (HR 2.52, 95 % CI 1.19-5.32), being in performance status 2-4 (HR 1.44, 95 % CI 1.15-1.81), and having an astrocytic tumor (HR 3.79, 95 % CI 1.64-8.73) were associated with poor survival. Mutated IDH1 (mIDH1) was identified in 46 % of the patients and was significantly correlated to a good survival in both univariate (HR 0.24, 95 % CI 0.11-0.53) and in multivariate analysis (HR 0.40, 95 % CI 0.17-0.91). The other clinical variables were not significant when adjusted for the effect of mIDH1 status. We find that young age, the absence of neurologic deficit, PS 0-1 and oligodendroglial histology were associated with better survival. IDH1 status showed independent prognostic information when adjusting for classical prognostic factors, and should be validated in a larger patient population.|
|Molecular Profile||Treatment Approach|
|Gene Name||Source||Synonyms||Protein Domains||Gene Description||Gene Role|
|Therapy Name||Drugs||Efficacy Evidence||Clinical Trials|
|Drug Name||Trade Name||Synonyms||Drug Classes||Drug Description|
|Gene||Variant||Impact||Protein Effect||Variant Description||Associated with drug Resistance|
|Molecular Profile||Indication/Tumor Type||Response Type||Therapy Name||Approval Status||Evidence Type||Efficacy Evidence||References|
|IDH1 mutant||malignant glioma||not applicable||N/A||Clinical Study||Prognostic||In multiple clinical studies, including two meta-analyses, IDH1 mutations were associated with improved overall survival and progression free survival in patients with gliomas (PMID: 23817809, PMID: 26220714, PMID: 23894344).||23894344 23817809 26220714|